stock market invest trade forex money

STI......with a hammer, decoupling from the rest?

With the head and shoulder formation, 12000 almost in touch, next support seems to be at 11600.

ttt,
why dont you conpare them using the same time-­frame­. i've compare them about 2 days ago. judging from the time-­frame­ of Oct '07, it was confirmed that KLCI and SENSEX de-coupled from others, including DJI, NASDAQ, FTSE, DAX & Nikkei. I didn't have Shanghai data at that time. so i dont know about Shanghai. But you can check it out.

Here is the post,
http:// klstockpick.blogspot .com/2008/01/asia- partial-decouple- from-us.html

hello,
i also think tat our CI seems to have decoupled from the others... but dunno if the decoupling can continue... at the beginning of Jan 08, the decoupling is very clear... last week, it seems be back... :( but i normally use individual charts to do my readings, but i should continue doing so anymore.. :)

ijanmaster, I put the charts separately because I want to see the indicators as well. They are of the same time ­frame­ but not on one ­frame­.

Lately the "decoupling" term seemed to be the trend. Personally I do not believe in "decoupling" - and fundamentally wise, I think Dali has got it. Read it in his blog - http:// malaysiafinance.blog spot.com/2008/01/ naive-vulnerable-if- you-check-out- last.html

And if technically wise, may I remind the TA users that there is indeed a TA branch called Intermarket Analysis?

No man is an island. No market is too. Thank you.

hi Max,
i have been reading our CI charts independently... however, i am starting to find something missing... tat is why i said "i'm wondering if i should continue doing so"... maybe this intermarket analysis is the answer... can please explain more on this? thanks...

The Advantage of Intermarket Analysis

http:// www.investopedia.com /articles/technical/ 04/012104.asp

ttt hit the nail on this one. ;)

RL, what is something missing? What are you looking for? If your ­object­ive is 100% winnings, I suspect any known branch of TA, FA, RA or even Random Walk Theory will not satisfy your quest.
If it is high accuracy, then work on to improve the system you are having.

A single chart - can give you more than 50% accuracy. A multiple time ­frame­ on a single "counter" can give you more than 70% accuracy. This is all assuming a risk reward ratio of at least 1:2. For 90% accuracy, you ll have to trade even lesser than the one in 70% while retaining the 1:2 R/R.

A more stable system would require adjustments to be made - some trades which would have been taken in the 50% or 70% accuracy system would be neglected.

I will not bother with tweaking the RR because it simply is not worth it. A sustainable strategy should retain the RR at minimum 1:2.

A 90% accuracy system retaining 1:2 RR is possible. Seen many ppl doing it.